Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 19th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Bury Free Press site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Dump the scales – no need for arithmatic



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
A NOT unusual topic of conversation among bar-side anglers – and a hackneyed question at angling forums – concerns which single item of tackle and a single angling method would you choose, if you were restricted to just that one.
Perhaps, like me, you have never heard the reverse debate. If you had to discard one item of tackle, what would it be? It is a fair question and I cannot wait to hand my personal answer on to you.

Each of us will have his own opinion and many of
you will not agree with mine. In my view, the most superfluous item of gear is a set of scales.

Do they really supply such invaluable information that an angler cannot live without it? I have often argued against the need for arithmetic in angling. I have encountered instances that ridicule bankside facts and figures.

I remember well a fish caught by one of a group of young men. It was a lovely mirror carp and they bundled it into a weigh-sling and gathered to look at the dial, which indicated 19lb10oz.

Condolences were muttered all round. ‘Hard luck Shaun.’ ‘Come back in a couple of months time’.

This beautiful fish was returned to the water without a single admiring glance or further comment. I could not believe it. It was treated like it was an outcast.

I am not saying that those chaps mistreated it in any way, but I know that if it had weighed about 8oz more, it would have been photographed, fondled, stroked and really made a fuss of – as would Shaun for having attained the ‘magic’ 20.

If it had reached that weight it would have been lauded, measured, celebrated and had its picture taken from every conceivable angle with its captor. I suppose one might reflect that perhaps for its own sake it was better for this ‘inferior’ fish to have been found wanting.

I know an angler who freely admitted to me that he had had an otherwise memorable day of fishing ruined because a roach he had caught weighed only 1lb 15oz, and not the magic 2lb that he had longed for all his life.

It would be all right if these anglers were only a small minority, but alas they are not and those that play the numbers game are on the increase. I find this obsession with statistics absolutely crazy.

I have not carried scales with me for many, many years. I have not missed them, nor regretted not having them with me.

Instead of gazing at the dial I sink in the colours, the perfect body shape and the fins. The sheer beauty of the creature that I had caught. Who needs figures and numbers? Who needs scales?

p p p

When the sun comes out and the wind drops, coastal waters turn clear and the fish tend to move out of range of beach fishermen. But, under the cover of darkness, fish move back inshore to feed. That is why, of course, beach angling is normally more productive at night.

Anglers unaccustomed to this nocturnal carry-on, but intending to give it a go, should bear one or two things in mind.



The full article contains 542 words and appears in Bury Free Press newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 01 September 2008 12:35 PM
  • Source: Bury Free Press
  • Location: Bury St Edmunds
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

There have been suggestions a new bank holiday should be introduced to mark Remembrance Day. Is this a good idea?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.