Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Bury Free Press site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bowls: As you were after top two both triumph



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

THERE is no change at the top of Bury and District Bowls League Division One after leaders, Greene King, and second-placed St Botolphs A, both gained four points from their away games against St Edmundsbury A and Tuddenham.
Stanton remain in third place, despite losing 60-75 (1.5-4.5 points) at Walsham.

In Division Two, Elmswell gained the advantage at the top after dropping half-a-point in their home game against Risbygate B.

Surprisingly, Hengrave and Mildenhall both lost 6-0 in their away games against Pakenham and Great Barton. Despite this, both maintain second and third places respectively.

In Division Three, British Sugar A gained 5.5 points at home against St Botolphs B to remain top of the table.

Risbygate A achieved maximum points at home against Thetford Ex-Servicemen – which took them to second place. However, Barnham are only half-a-point behind with a game in hand.

Brandon were the fourth team this week to take all six points on their visit to Thurston. Their rink of V Umfreville, Len Cox and Steve Hinton scored 29-6 – the rink of the week.


Area D Triples Bowls League results. Division One: Haughley 69(2), Greene King 86(4); Elmswell 60(1), St Botolphs 75(5); Tuddenham 54(0.5), Stow Rookery 79(5.5); St Edmundsbury A 51(1), Stanton 73(5); West Row 80(5), Coney Weston Swan 64(1); British Sugar B 87(1), Hopton 62(1). Stow Woodfield v Mildenhall, Ixworth v Pakenham, results not received.

Division Two: Bacton 69(5), Brandon 63(1); Earl Stonham 69(5), British Sugar C 63(1); Walsham-le-Willows 46(1), Barnham 78(5); Gt Barton 81(5), Mid Suffolk D C 57(1); Risbygate A 55(1.5), Stowuplands 63(4.5); St Edmundsbury B 58(1), Combs Ford 64(5); Hengrave 61(2), Thetford Ex-Service 71(4); British Sugar A 70(5), Risbygate B 49(1).


Suffolk County EBA Triples League results.

Division One: West Row 101 (6), Ixworth 43 (0); Boxford 88 (6), British Sugar 47 (0); Haverhill 84 (6), Risbygate A 55 (0).

Division Two: St Edmundsbury 74(5), Risbygate Z 52(1).

Ipswich Area. Division Three: Ipswich BC Z 75(5), Earl Stonham 62(1).

Division Four: Bacton 83(5), Chantry 49(1).


Bury and District League. Division One. St Edmundsbury 69(2), Greene King 84(4): R Burroughs, H Irwin, D Fulton 24(1), R Skillings, P Challis, N Bennett 21; B Coley, M Golston, K Brown-Warr 16, K Hale, I Levett, A Bishop 25(1); J Goldsmith, B Vining, P Plummer 10, P Denman, J Bloomfield, R Bryant 20(1); B Smalley, C Bailey, J Sturgeon 19(1), R Brett, A Melton, J Denman 18.


Stowmarket and District Bowls Leagues. Monday Division Three. Old Newton 71, Elmswell 77: P Collins, C Leader, A Markell 22, B Tullett, A Cruickshank, I Tullett 15; T Whottes, K Powley, J Shade 12, T Clarke, T Spence, A Mudge 29; S Arnold, H Gooderham, G Dorling 20, J Sparrow, F Boxall, E Crouchman 16; A Pearl, B Cobbold, P Catchpole 17, S Bloomfield, S Faulkner, T Bloomfield 17.

Tuesday Afternoon Section C. Bildeston 52, Elmswell A 23: D Shelly, J Brown, P Mayes 22, L Abbott, M Newman, E Crouchman 10; D Sharpe, B Foster, T Sharpe 30, C Nunn, S Faulkner, M Moore 13.

Tuesday Afternoon Section A.

The full article contains 580 words and appears in Bury Free Press newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 31 July 2008 1:59 PM
  • Source: Bury Free Press
  • Location: Bury St Edmunds
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.