Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 5th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Flight paths detrimental



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
01 May 2008
A council this week condemned plans to change Stansted Airport's flight paths – arguing it would be detrimental to the tranquillity of rural villages.
At an environmental policy panel on Monday, Mid Suffolk district councillors recommended the council objects to proposals for a new stacking area for aircraft queuing to land at Stansted Airport.

The proposals by the National Air Traffic Service (Nats) would see aircraft flying over Needham Market, Lavenham, Cockfield, Felsham and Thorpe Morieux.

But councillors say the proposal is contrary to the Department of Transport's guidance to the Civil Aviation Authority and would impact on local tourism and lead to increases in noise.

The recommendation will go to full council on May 15 to be agreed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Have your say on this article - scroll to the top of the story and click on 'comment' or email the editor with your views.

Click here to go back to our news index.


The full article contains 154 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 8:57 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Bury St Edmunds
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.